Now, don’t get me wrong. I’m not attempting to put a smiley face and a rainbow over a bleak economic condition. We’re going through tough economic conditions. If you’re not personally feeling the pinch, all you have to do is read/watch the news to see the havoc the economy is wreaking on businesses and citizens.
Obama is insistent that Congress have a stimulus bill ready by February 16. He stands firm on this deadline and shows no sign of being flexible with it.
In his Feb. 3 interview with Fox News correspondent, Chris Wallace, he was asked:
"You are taking hits right now from all sides: right and left. Columbia University economist Jeffrey Sachs calls it a, quote, "astounding mish-mash of tax cuts, public investments, transfer payments, and special treats for insiders."
Why not just pull it back, forget about the February 16 deadline, and get it right?"
He answers with the same talking points of how “great” the stimulus package is.
Then Chris Wallace asks:
“Is the February 16 deadline firm?”
Obama responds, “Yes, because nobody disagrees with the idea that, if we keep on putting this off, that we're going to end up seeing more months with half a million people losing their jobs each month. We can't afford to wait.”
http://www.foxnews.com/ Excuse me, Mr. Obama? Nobody disagrees that putting it off isn’t a good idea?
Considering that over 50% of the proposed package will *not* be spent for 2 or more years, we can’t afford to haphazardly and hastily pass a bill loaded with pork, junk, and goodies for the Democrats’ special interest groups.
Many critics and I believe that we should cut out the portion of the bill that will provide immediate relief and will be immediately spent to achieve that goal. All the other non-sense can be put on hold and debated.
Where is the need to rush along portions of the package that won’t be spent until 2010 or later?
We rushed $350-billion to the financial industry and were sold short with the results.
Have the Democrats not learned from history?
There’s an old saying: “Haste makes waste.”
That saying has proven to be true with the first stimulus package we gifted to the banks… will it also prove to be true to this House bill?
Slow down... Let's examine this thing.
Let's expose the sponsors of the pork projects so that other lawmakers will be deterred from attempting the same.
Let's get this done right, Obama. You're proposing to spend more money in your first month of Presidency than was spent all of last year.
Your failure to fully vet your appointees has proven to be quite a headache for you in the past two weeks. Do you want to be haunted for the remainder of your term for not doing your homework and wisely spending $1-trillion in taxpayer dollars?
Yes, Mr. Obama, you entered the White House with great popularity and infectious enthusiasm from the American people. And if you can’t remember back to when we forked over $350-billion to the financial industry and the “results” it produced, then maybe you’ll keep this little nugget of history with you:
Jimmy Carter had the highest post-inauguration approval ratings ever. Despite the early fanfare and high popularity, he was only a 1-term president. Reality ground him down and his incompetence prevented his re-election.