ShortNews
+ + + 3 BRANDNEW NewsTickers for your Website! + + + easy configurable in less than 1 Minute + + + GET'EM NOW! + + +

   Home | Join | Submit News | MyShortNews | HighScores | FAQ'S | Forums 1 User in chat | 7 Users Online   
   
                 11/21/2009 11:13 AM  
  ShortNews Search
search all Channels
RSS feeds
   Top News Science
E-mails Leaked: Are Global Warming Scientists Hoaxing?
Art Collector Found Galileo´s Fingers and Tooth
NASA to Irradiate Primates Again
Significant Amount of Water Found on the Moon
22 New Galaxies Discovered
Vatican Starts Search for E.T.
U.S. is Heating Up: Twice as Many Record Highs as Record Lows in Past 10 Years
Shark Performs Caesarean Section
Stress Reduced by Chocolate Consumption: Study
more News
out of this Channel...
  1.362 Visits   4 Assessments  Show users who Rated this:
Quality:Very Good
Back to Overview  
01/27/2004 11:06 AM ID: 36444 Permalink   

Neanderthals Not Our Ancestors

 

A new study coming out of New York University suggests that modern humans are not, in fact, related to the Neanderthals, a widely believed theory among Evolutionists. Katerina Harvati and a team of scientists studied a Neanderthal skull.

The skull was then compared with skulls from early and modern humans, and the skulls of other primates. The study was published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences journal.

The differences found between the skulls of Neanderthals and Humans were so great, that it is impossible that Neanderthals were a human subspecies. Also, the differences were more prominent than those found in primates.

 
  Source: www.msnbc.msn.com  
  WebReporter: Lois_Lane Show Calling Card      
  Recommendation:  
ASSESS this news: BLOCK this news. Reason:
   
  5 Comments
  
  watched a documentry on discovery  
 said they aren't our ancesters...

 
 by: crispyhumanfetus   01/27/2004 12:43 PM     
  Uh...  
 We've known that for a very long time. Neanderthals were always considered a seperately evolved species of primate...  
 by: p_g_chris   01/28/2004 02:07 AM     
  exactly  
 don't know if he posted news from years ago or something lol 
 by: crispyhumanfetus   01/28/2004 04:40 PM     
  Brings a new meaning to the term...  
 ..."old news"! 
 by: BingohanZ     01/28/2004 06:19 PM     
  haha... hmm, it seems new enough  
 just some bored newspaper reporter trying to breath life into an old topic... our lois lane prolly didn't realise... unfortunatly the guys at msnbc succeded 
 by: p_g_chris   01/28/2004 10:52 PM     
 
 
Copyright ©2009 ShortNews GmbH & Co. KG, Contact: info@shortnews.com