ShortNews
+ + + 3 BRANDNEW NewsTickers for your Website! + + + easy configurable in less than 1 Minute + + + GET'EM NOW! + + +

   Home | Join | Submit News | MyShortNews | HighScores | FAQ'S | Forums Chat | 11 Users Online   
   
                 11/21/2009 07:40 AM  
  ShortNews Search
search all Channels
RSS feeds
   Top News Health
Stuck in Recliner 8 Months, Man Dies
New Hope for the Cure of Brain Disease
Man Survives Having Half His Body Amputated
Toddler Helps Deliver Sibling
Man Designs Electric Wheelchair That Can Climb Stairs
Conjoined Twins Successfully Separated in Marathon 27 Hour Surgery
Let´s Study Pot: AMA
CDC: 4,000 Killed by Swine Flu in US
Lack of Health Care Kills More Veterans than Afghan War
New Technique Which Would Allow Breast Cancer Survivors to Grow New Breasts to be Trialed
more News
out of this Channel...
  ShortNews User Poll
Do you own a gun?
  Latest Events
11/21/2009 07:32 AM
Dick Tracy receives 20 Points for Comment about 'Canadian Woman Loses Health Insurance Over "Happy" Facebook Photos'
11/21/2009 06:53 AM
hellblazer receives 20 Points for Comment about 'U.S. is Heating Up: Twice as Many Record Highs as Record Lows in Past 10 Years'
11/21/2009 06:21 AM
Ben_Reilly receives 20 Points for Comment about 'New Unemployment Claims Take Unexpected Drop in U.S.'
11/21/2009 06:12 AM
jbloodthorn receives 20 Points for Comment about 'Taylor Swift Makes History'
11/21/2009 06:04 AM
jbloodthorn receives 20 Points for Comment about 'Oprah Announces End of Her Show'
11/21/2009 05:57 AM
hellblazer receives 20 Points for Comment about 'New Unemployment Claims Take Unexpected Drop in U.S.'
11/21/2009 05:54 AM
redstain receives 20 Points for Comment about '10-Year-Old Girl Tased'
11/21/2009 05:51 AM
hellblazer receives 20 Points for Comment about 'New Unemployment Claims Take Unexpected Drop in U.S.'
11/21/2009 05:46 AM
redstain receives 20 Points for Comment about '10-Year-Old Girl Tased'
11/21/2009 05:46 AM
bbeljefe receives 20 Points for Comment about 'Woman Investigates Splash, Finds Cow'
  710 Visits   2 Assessments  Show users who Rated this:
Quality:Very Good
Back to Overview  
04/27/2005 12:55 AM ID: 47724 Permalink   

Prescription Drug Ads on TV are Effective

 

In a study published in this week’s Journal of the American Medical Association, researchers report that they used actors to visit doctors and followed three different scripts at various times.

In one script they said they had seen an ad for Paxil on television, an anti-depressant made by GlaxoSmithKline Plc and asked for it, in another they said they had seen a TV special about depression and wondered if a drug would
help them.

The reports, “sound a cautionary note for direct-to-consumer advertising but also highlight opportunities for improving care of depression (and perhaps other chronic conditions) by using public media channels to expand patient involvement in care.”

 
  Source: www.msnbc.msn.com  
  WebReporter: lurker Show Calling Card      
  Recommendation:  
ASSESS this news: BLOCK this news. Reason:
   
  8 Comments
  
  ? I don't get it ?  
 
How do actors asking doctors for drugs prove that ads are effective?
 
 by: rapscaLLion   04/27/2005 01:26 AM     
  I get it..  
 
What part of the story do you not understand?
 
 by: TheReporter     04/27/2005 01:34 AM     
  Why should...  
 
I get a bad rating because you can't understand the source article?
 
 by: lurker     04/27/2005 03:07 AM     
  Poorly formulated.  
 
The source story is clear: Doctor's are likely to prescribe drugs when they are asked for by name. No where in your summery does it indicate that. I should not have to read the source to understand the basic point.

"Prescription Drug Ads on TV are Effective"
I expect that to be quantified.

"In a study published in this week’s Journal of the American Medical Association, researchers report that they used actors to visit doctors and followed three different scripts at various times."
Great. A medical publication hired actors to visit doctors.

"In one script they said they had seen an ad for Paxil on television, an anti-depressant made by GlaxoSmithKline Plc and asked for it, In another they said they had seen a TV special about depression and wondered if a drug would
help them."
Great, the actors asked for name brand medications, or asked about drugs they may not need.


"The reports, “sound a cautionary note for direct-to-consumer advertising but also highlight opportunities for improving care of depression (and perhaps other chronic conditions) by using public media channels to expand patient involvement in care.”"
Great, there may be issues with advertising and the like.

The key point that your source makes and your summery does not is summed up in the following from the source: "researchers found that the actors who asked for drugs often got them — leading to what would be considered proper levels of care. However, in some cases drugs were prescribed for a condition that did not warrant them."

See what I'm saying?
 
 by: rapscaLLion   04/27/2005 05:49 AM     
  I understood it just fine n/t  
 
n/t
 
 by: StarShadow     04/27/2005 12:30 PM     
  @rapscaLLion  
 
I have to agree with you. After reading the summary I was a little confused as to what it was trying to say. An additional 2 or 3 sentences would have clearified things
 
 by: fats3287   04/27/2005 08:08 PM     
  the main point  
 
may have been implied, but it should really be stated. I had to read the source to find the point. I've read the summery over and over again, and it does not communicate what it should. My evaluation stands.
 
 by: rapscaLLion   04/27/2005 08:16 PM     
  I don't think the problem...  
 
is ads for prescription, but doctors who don't make sure that these people have what the say they have. I know that depression is hard to diagnose, but that's why you send someone saying they have depression to a counsellor or psychiatrist to be evaluated. I have often gone to my doctor and told him about a drug I saw on tv, I ask him if it is something I should be using (only for conditions I actually have) most of the time he says no, it's not for you and you shouldn't take it. This is a responsible doctor, the ads say to talk to your doctor to see if this is for you, why are doctors prescribing drugs to people without knowing they have a need for it. That worries me more than drugs being advertised on tv.
 
 by: flowerchild   04/27/2005 11:40 PM     
 
 
Copyright ©2009 ShortNews GmbH & Co. KG, Contact: info@shortnews.com