ShortNews
+ + + 3 BRANDNEW NewsTickers for your Website! + + + easy configurable in less than 1 Minute + + + GET'EM NOW! + + +

   Home | Join | Submit News | MyShortNews | HighScores | FAQ'S | Forums 0 Users Online   
   
                 01/22/2018 03:40 AM  
  ShortNews Search
search all Channels
RSS feeds
  ShortNews User Poll
Are you excited about the holiday season?
  Latest Events
  5.872 Visits   5 Assessments  Show users who Rated this:
Quality:Very Good
Back to Overview  
01/04/2007 05:49 AM ID: 59318 Permalink   

Oops: Student Accidentally Submits Kiddie Porn Collection Instead of Exam

 

An 18-year-old boy is facing serious legal sanctions after an ill-fated mix-up, in which he submitted the wrong CD to his professor. The professor asked for students to submit their exams on a CD, where he would read them electronically.

Andrew Erickson finished his exam, and soon after submitted a CD to his prof. Unbeknownst to him, he accidentally sent a CD containing his child pornography collection, which depicted children from age 7 to 14 indulging in explicit sexual acts.

The professor alerted school authorities, who then alerted police. It appears that Erickson noticed the blunder prior to his arrest, and emailed the prof asking for the disk back, saying it had his friends music collection on it.

 
  Source: www.heraldnews.com  
    WebReporter: Quantum1.5 Show Calling Card      
  Recommendation:  
ASSESS this news: BLOCK this news. Reason:
   
  36 Comments
  
  Wow  
 
The grade on that assignment is going to hurt.
 
  by: ixuzus     01/04/2007 06:17 AM     
  @ixuzus  
 
Glad you could find humor in the destruction of 700mbs worth of kids lives.
 
  by: shoezacks   01/04/2007 06:51 AM     
  @shoezacks  
 
Glad to see you take a subject so seriously, even the most irrelevant joke will offend you.
 
  by: Smpz   01/04/2007 07:17 AM     
  @shoezacks  
 
It was simply a play on words indicating that the penalty for this bad assignment was going to be worse than most because the 'assignment' was, well, much worse that most. If you found it funny...
 
  by: ixuzus     01/04/2007 07:29 AM     
  Meh  
 
Let shoezaks be, obviously the world is a better place now that we know how serious he looks upon this atrocity. You should all be ashamed and take things just as seriously, there is no room to make light of the uncontrolably deviant world. ;-P (Sarcasm)

To me this is fate in the working.

 
  by: luc1ddr3am     01/04/2007 08:05 AM     
  @everybody  
 
Stupidity is usually a self-correcting problem.
 
  by: White Albino   01/04/2007 09:30 AM     
  @shoezacks  
 
How the hell did you read that into ixuzus comment
 
  by: sleeky     01/04/2007 10:57 AM     
  I also think  
 
the animal got what he deserved.
 
  by: sleeky     01/04/2007 10:58 AM     
  Oh Snap?  
 
Quote from the source article in the email to the professor:

"Oh snap, I am sorry. I accidentally gave you my friend's mixed music CD that I meant to keep here and install the music on my computer,"

"I found the CD with the (final exam) on it. If there's some way I could send it to you, that would be great.

"I am sorry about that, and hope it didn't affect the grade at all. Again, if I could get that CD back so that I can install the music. Sorry for the mix up."

-end quote


Oh snap! I've been nabbed by the coppers! I know- I'll plead 'Not Guilty'! That'll work!

A+ for being a dumbass! Congratulations you go to the head of the class.
 
  by: theironboard     01/04/2007 11:24 AM     
  Well  
 
Not much to say. Maybe he should start jerking it to term papers, then at least if he handed in the wrong disc, he would still be ok.
 
  by: RoBBoB     01/04/2007 04:26 PM     
  I'm surprised  
 
nobody has yet called out for his blood. Let me correct that, shall I?

OMG WTF?!? Chop his **** off, that sick little pervert! He should be tortured to death that animal!

</sarcasm>

There we go, the obligatory knee-jerk reaction to a sex crime. Now we can all sleep a little easier tonight.
 
  by: ChaoticVengeance     01/04/2007 04:57 PM     
  I'm shocked! And outraged!  
 
And so should all the community be!

Send him to a Priest!

WAIT, no.

No, to PRISON!

Wait, same story.

It's no good anywhere, is it?
 
  by: Hollywood   01/04/2007 05:56 PM     
  IDIOT!  
 
He deserves to be locked up for this....

Has he never heard for a damn felt-tip pen? Or a magic marker????

 
  by: hotrock11     01/04/2007 06:05 PM     
  Should have phoned some parents  
 
then told him to come over and collect it.
 
  by: AccessG     01/04/2007 07:23 PM     
  good  
 
i hope i speak for everyone in this news community when i say this kid needs help and the world would be better with people like this behind bars.
 
  by: darkrom666   01/04/2007 07:38 PM     
  @You speak for the mob  
 
And the mob is rank full of idiots.

And stupid, old, ugly people.

http://www.wfmynews2.com/...

And then there are young and beautiful people they are jealous of, who they'd like to claim are ignorant of their actions.

They aren't ignorant. On the contrary, they are doing what you cannot do, which is to expose themselves for the beautiful, brilliant people they are.

You'll hate them for it, but I love them for it.

Children are the greatest consumers of "child porn."

<deleted by admin>

A child, that is. I'm not admitting to anything beyond that but draw your own inferences.

You really don't know who's looking at what on the Internet, do you?

Abuse should never be condoned, nor torture, kidnapping, rape, any of that.

The idea of the asexual child however is now due to go the way of the Victorian notion of the asexual, sexually dependent woman.

The Puritans were fighting human nature, and you have to be a right masochist to agree with that. I myself, I'm a bit more easygoing.

For shame? For shame to the hypocrite Puritan!

My tastes have matured somewhat as I've gotten older, I would like to add for no apparent reason or with any relevance here. <deleted by admin>
 
  by: Hollywood   01/04/2007 08:32 PM     
  Wow!  
 
Looks like he was a college student.

At first I thought it was a student like a 14 year old looking at other 14 year olds and was curious would a 14 year old looking at other 14 year olds be in troulbe other than looking at pornography?

But I see it was a college age guy, that is disgusting. Plus the whole 7-14 year old thing gross.

Get these people help. They need mental help or something. Don't just throw them in prison, let them out, throw them back, let them out. Get them some help while they are there, drugs, hypnosis or something.

 
  by: shawn1flog   01/04/2007 09:35 PM     
  @hollywood  
 
Theres nothing beautiful or brilliant about child porn. I don't see what you are getting at. Maybe I'm missing some of the picture here because your comment got chopped up.
 
  by: koenig32   01/04/2007 09:43 PM     
  @Hollywood  
 
Pardon my stupidity but...
wut?
 
  by: DarkWave     01/05/2007 12:04 AM     
  ...  
 
That is so beyond sick.
 
  by: Illuminated_Night   01/05/2007 03:59 AM     
  @ Hollywood  
 
Are you advocating child pornography? Certainly sounds as you are.

Then with a statement like this:

"Abuse should never be condoned, nor torture, kidnapping, rape, any of that",

only shows that you have no clue whatsoever how MUCH of child pornography is ever acheived.
 
  by: Discarded Vet   01/05/2007 04:57 AM     
  @White Albino  
 
Smooth, real smooth. They should have dropped it at that.
- And as for the article, that kid's sick and should be locked up.
-np-
 
  by: NicPre     01/05/2007 07:21 AM     
  lol  
 
hahaha always a sketchy mixup. any1 seen road trip? when he mails his girlfriend a video of him cheating on her instead of his video he made singing a song?
 
  by: ke1n   01/05/2007 08:09 AM     
  @Lynch mob  
 
I'm advocating the freedom of expression, and I don't find a limitation on that to be implied to exist because a young person happens to be the one expressing themself.

Look at the link in the rant.

The idea that young people (7, granted, is improbably not related to abuse) are without sexual feeling or that their feelings are less legitimate is a bigoted notion not suited for this century.

It is the very premise that teenagers, and moreover children's feelings are illegitimate that leads to their abuse and mistreatment.

You cannot condition young people to accept orders and be obedient, and to disregard their own feelings, and then expect them not to hop into a stranger's car, or permit people older than themselves to abuse them.

If one can do it, it grooms them for another.

A parent who lords over a child, some would say is good for them; it only does them so much of a favor.

Take a corrupt person who would lord over them similarly, and what do you have?

They accept the role, they are used to being directed. It is no different for them. Their morality is externally directed. Their sense of it is, as they are conditioned to expect it, dependent on the judgements of others.

This is far too academic. I am, after all, attempting to reason with a lynch mob, no matter how well-intentioned a one it might be.

I say, so long as he personally wasn't out molesting anyone, or hurting them, the kid, and 18 is still very much a kid, was simply interested as most 18 year olds are, in viewing pornography online. So his interests took him into the obscene and possibly dangerous materials. The criminals here are the ones that act as though he harbored some kind of malicious evil, or brought it, by viewing, and masturbating likely to those pictures.

No, that is an ape relieving himself.

Anyone that has fancy ideas of what more it is, they are the criminals. You complicate it with your own jealousies and self-denials... oh you hypocrite lot of you.

Youth is beautiful, and he is wicked for lusting after it. That's ridiculous hypocrisy, I won't cover it. It is more obscene than his viewing the materials, the hypocrisy is.

"Help" would consist mostly of people leaving well enough alone to people's private fantasies. There is a qualitative and actual difference between viewing pictures of an act and commiting it one's self.

That said "Oh snap," what a fool, and perhaps given his carelessness, he deserves the trouble he has now.

We viewed Saddam's execution, does it make us his executioners? If you follow some religious philosophies, it does.

But anyway, he's a stupid kid. I really ought not raise a merited point in the context of what is indefensible idiocy.

Apologies, you may proceed with your lynching.
 
  by: Hollywood   01/05/2007 11:28 AM     
  Geez, Doc Hollywood....  
 
... sounds like you are masturbating to your own smug attitude.
 
  by: theironboard     01/05/2007 12:46 PM     
  .......  
 
SHOOT THE BASTARD
 
  by: guns'n'budweiser   01/05/2007 03:09 PM     
  To kinda defend mr. Hollywood  
 
While I don't quite see it the way he does, I will say that as a 19 year old male in this day, it is hard sometimes to not still notice some of the more "developed" 16-17 year old females. I mean hell, if I didn't ask for an I.D. I wouldn't even know how old they were. With that being said, those ages are still pretty close to my age range, unlike the 7 year old child, which I think is doing way too much. But I do think its kind of hard as an 18 year old male to just suddenly start thinking "well, I can't look at anyone younger than me anymore, cuz now its illegal." Our bodies simply won't allow us to do that. That being said, everyone's limits are different as to what they consider to be "too young" to look at. I think his age was a LOT younger than most.
 
  by: kcking05     01/05/2007 03:45 PM     
  hollywood  
 
TALK TALK, but you said nothing! What a rambling mess
 
  by: old man   01/05/2007 04:11 PM     
  And  
 
the 7th award award goes to Hollywood) I have 3 more pls dont fill them.

Hollywood [quote]I say, so long as he personally wasn't out molesting anyone, or hurting them, the kid, and 18 is still very much a kid, was simply interested as most 18 year olds are [/quote]<< This quote is from the same content above, this is after this comment. [quote]They accept the role, they are used to being directed. It is no different for them. Their morality is externally directed.[/quote]

Are these Schizoaffective disorder syndrome or is it plain Schitzophrenia!!
 
  by: kinko     01/05/2007 04:24 PM     
  @Hollywood  
 
my hypothesis goes something like this:

a. you do not have children

b. if you do have children, you are deluding yourself into believing that they have the ability / experience to make good decisions for themselves in every way.

regardless of a. or b. you are a threat to society. children do not have enough experience to not touch a hot iron until they have touched it and been burned. so does that mean as a parent we should not teach them about getting burned, and hopefully avoid some of those burns?

a parents responsibility is to protect and teach. children will make their own decisions in almost everything ... but like a Drill Sargeant in the armed forces will instill a sense of order, and a sense of cause and effect ... so must a parent teach their child that every action has an equal and opposite reaction ... if we dont ... then we are releasing a non-cooperative, non-contributing human being into the world.

i submit that you, and those like you, those who consume child porn ... are not interested in porn for the child, or any ridiculous sense of art ... but more out of your own self interest ... and your own needs. and i sincerely doubt that every child involved in child porn is there of their own voalition.
 
  by: bpearson   01/06/2007 12:43 AM     
  @Blinded by prejudice  
 
>>a. you do not have children<<<

This isn't relevant.

>>b. if you do have children, you are deluding yourself into believing that they have the ability / experience to make good decisions for themselves in every way.<<<

Incorrect, absolutely dead wrong. I advocated for the opposite approach. Education and permission to learn for themselves. That dosen't mean I won't warn them of danger, it just means that if I specifically keep them from it, they'll only learn that I, possibly arbitrarily am keeping doing things that they think they'd like to.

So getting burned is an educational experience. I'll warn, I'll slap a hand once or twice. I won't prohibit them from gainging the experience if they appear to really be determined to touch the burner however.

I consider it more cruel to baby children and insulate them from harm. You limit their exposure, sure, but you let them know you won't always be there to protect them.

Smug kids running around thinking they are invincible are a phenomenon that we observe because they have no sense of judgement -- they've never learned to use it. They've relied on older people's.

I'm advocating understanding. Not protection or insulating young people.

>>regardless of a. or b. you are a threat to society.<<<

No, society is a threat to itself, I merely point out the fact and that f**ks up people already in denial about their and other's vulnerabilities.

>>>children do not have enough experience to not touch a hot iron until they have touched it and been burned. so does that mean as a parent we should not teach them about getting burned, and hopefully avoid some of those burns?<<<

Hopefully so. As I said above, I favor education, not prohibition or insulation beyond some appropriate minimum.

>>>a parents responsibility is to protect and teach. children will make their own decisions in almost everything ... but like a Drill Sargeant in the armed forces will instill a sense of order, and a sense of cause and effect ... so must a parent teach their child that every action has an equal and opposite reaction ... if we dont ... then we are releasing a non-cooperative, non-contributing human being into the world.<<<

That's lovely. When you train them so well, do you make a point to distinguish your instructions and drill-sergeant behavior from that of others?

Or is the first and nearest person to act like a drill-sergeant someone you want them to listen to?

They need to be trained to be guarded and use their own minds, not to react mindlessly to instructions.

That's something few people are willing to teach them, but it is the best thing they can learn.

>>>i submit that you, and those like you, those who consume child porn ... <<<

I don't consume it. I don't produce it. I used to produce it, when I was under 18. I took pictures of my naked self.

Like those girls did, at 15, in the link I listed above. It's pretty screwed up that I could have been prosecuted for that had anyone seen them.

That's society's being f**ed up, I had no problem with it. My body my choice, bit**ez.

>>>are not interested in porn for the child, or any ridiculous sense of art <<<

No, I enjoy art. I enjoy classical works of art. Greek art. Roman art. When Enlightenment wasn't treated as superstition and evil, but embraced as the social order of the day.

That's class, something common people such as yourselves have no understanding of or appreciation for. That's art, and the vulgar masses will never know the meaning of art, only commercial sloganeering.

>>>... but more out of your own self interest ... and your own needs. and i sincerely doubt that every child involved in child porn is there of their own voalition.<<<

I prove you wrong. Those girls in that story prove you wrong. Tens of thousands of young people on MySpace interacting with each other in "inappropriate" ways, they also prove you wrong.

You are a parent, you allude to, and you are concerned for your children; fine. Your children are their own people, and only coming more to be. You can try to keep them from knowledge, but we've long since bitten that apple and rested under that tree.

That's a failed old battle. If young people want to enjoy their bodies, let them. If we weren't so deluded overall as a culture about sexuality, we'd find there to be not only nothing wrong with their exploration of their own bodies, but everything right with it.

You develop maturity in accepting yourself for who you are. The old system of self-denial making for externally-directed, developmentally-stunted people is failing. Everywhere, people are realizing their individuality, the old power structures of church and state no longer suffice to compel people to be neurotic fools.

And I am of the new breed, a heathen lot that considers the World with critical eyes and believes themselves to be seeking Enlightenment.

And we will push aside the bonds of your anci
 
  by: Hollywood   01/07/2007 06:51 PM     
  @continuation  
 

You develop maturity in accepting yourself for who you are. The old system of self-denial making for externally-directed, developmentally-stunted people is failing. Everywhere, people are realizing their individuality, the old power structures of church and state no longer suffice to compel people to be neurotic fools.

And I am of the new breed, a heathen lot that considers the World with critical eyes and believes themselves to be seeking Enlightenment.

And we will push aside the bonds of your ancient tyrannies, which constrained you from growing, but will not serve to constrain us.

In part that will be accomplished by taking pictures. Shame is for the neurotic. I am beutiful and not ashamed. No one should be.
 
  by: Hollywood   01/07/2007 06:51 PM     
  *giggle*  
 
You develop manure in accepting yourself for who you aren't. The old windows system of self-denial making for internally-directed, developmentally-midget people is failing. Everywhere, people are realizing their fishing boats, the old power bar structure of GNC and state no longer suffice to compel people to be erotic fools.

And I am of the new seed, a Heather Locklear that considers the World with critical updates and believes themselves to be seeking to turn on the light.

And we will push aside the James Bonds of your ancient trannies, which constrained you from e-growing, but will not serve to ejaculate us.

In part that will be accomplished by taking pictures. Shame is for the erotic. I am beutiful and cantt spell for shit. No one should be.

 
  by: morph   01/13/2007 01:22 PM     
  morph  
 
morph:

Coontemplating that concatonation of crap, I ask, can comment continue concurrently, or cogently, else commonly to a contumatious conclusion of that common claptrap?

In short(news) Braaaaap!
 
  by: nofile404   01/19/2007 10:17 AM     
  While  
 
Pervs donload or buy this crap, it is still going on and on.

I say ten years hard labor and tagged on getting out.
 
  by: captainJane     01/29/2007 07:54 PM     
  Child abuse  
 
As someone who suffered child abuse (in the full implications of the phrase) from the age of c 5 years to c 13 years I would like to point out that such an experience absolutely destroys all hope you may otherwise have harboured for a 'normal' life.

The resulting trauma and anguish NEVER leave the victim and the younger the child, the more they will feel 'guilty' over the abuse. Yes, it is the abused child who assumes the guilt - others may not understand that but anyone who has suffered can confirm this for you.

The only relief from carrying that guilt came after years of counseling when I finally reported the perpetrator to the authorities. Way too late but the fact is that it transported the guilt back where it truly belonged and left me clean.

It's way too late for me to have any kind of normality in my life. My entire life has been affected by the abuse in every way possible, starting from lack of confidence to an inherent mistrust of everyone.

Furthermore, you can't alter the mind or behaviour of someone who is interested in the 'beauty' of innocence as Hollywood would like us to believe, if they truly appreciated beauty they would not set out to degrade and despoil it.

Hand child abusers over to the parents of abused children or to adults who were abused in their childhood and you might see some real justice.
 
  by: Angie0   03/04/2007 01:43 PM     
 
 
Copyright ©2018 ShortNews GmbH & Co. KG, Contact: info@shortnews.com