ShortNews
+ + + 3 BRANDNEW NewsTickers for your Website! + + + easy configurable in less than 1 Minute + + + GET'EM NOW! + + +

   Home | Join | Submit News | MyShortNews | HighScores | FAQ'S | Forums 0 Users Online   
   
                 01/22/2018 03:39 AM  
  ShortNews Search
search all Channels
RSS feeds
  ShortNews User Poll
Are you excited about the holiday season?
  Latest Events
  3.794 Visits   4 Assessments  Show users who Rated this:
Quality:Very Good
Back to Overview  
08/31/2009 10:16 PM ID: 80473 Permalink   

Racism in Moscow

 

The Moscow Protestant Chaplaincy reports that 60 percent of the black population in Moscow have been physically assaulted, 25 percent more than once, and 80 percent assaulted verbally.

One man reported being stabbed multiple times in the back and then shot, another claimed to have an attacker try to scalp him.

The black population in Moscow is leery of going out in public and using public conveyances. BBC's Rupert Wingfield Hayes has said that the Africans living in Russia are under a state of virtual siege.

 
  Source: news.bbc.co.uk  
    WebReporter: ichi Show Calling Card      
  Recommendation:  
ASSESS this news: BLOCK this news. Reason:
   
  38 Comments
  
  :(  
 
my heart goes out to them
 
  by: nimira     08/31/2009 11:00 PM     
  Mine Too  
 
N/T
 
  by: ichi     08/31/2009 11:47 PM     
  This is ironic.  
 
Usually, it is the other way around.
 
  by: walter3ca   09/01/2009 12:39 AM     
  @Walter  
 
"Usually, it is the other way around."

Care to explain? are you saying Blacks in Russia are usually racist against Russians!?
 
  by: skcusswentrohs     09/01/2009 12:45 AM     
  @skcusswentrohs  
 
What are you saying?! That a Black person in Russia could not possibly also be Russian?!!

Or were you saying that all Black Russians hate themselves?!!!

I'm confused
 
  by: teh_epic     09/01/2009 01:22 AM     
  What brings them to Russia?  
 
I can't imagine.
 
  by: H. W. Hutchins   09/01/2009 05:47 AM     
  @skcusswentrohs  
 
I think walter is saying is that black-on-white crime is statistically way higher than white-on-black crime. Take a look at the FBI crime statistics.

It's the same here in Canada, though our police forces aren't permitted to keep racial statistics for crime....I wonder why?
 
  by: rippler2k3   09/01/2009 05:58 AM     
  This is very wrong..  
 
"It's the same here in Canada, though our police forces aren't permitted to keep racial statistics for crime....I wonder why" rippler2k3

Is no one approaching this problem? As for Russia unless they deal with this rising racial tension they are going to continue to look pretty bad in fount of the world.
 
  by: captainJane     09/01/2009 12:55 PM     
  What  
 
I was asking is about Russia and being black in Russia. Meaning An African in Russia. A Black man born anywhere in the World is still an African, gets treated like a second class Citizen and is never acknowledged at a face value as an Indigenous, save Africa. That said.

@Rippler:
"black-on-white crime is statistically way higher than white-on-black crime. Take a look at the FBI crime statistics.

It's the same here in Canada, though our police forces aren't permitted to keep racial statistics for crime....I wonder why?"

I wonder where did you concoct these findings about Canada from!? Since you admit that Canada does not keep statistics on crimes based on racial profiling! Do you think maybe FBI and you; are all working from the same desk! Namely fabricators of truth! Just asking.

I was at Alperton station and heard a commotion. Went to see whats happening and saw this huge guy pummeling a black Kid with a baseball bat (Alluminum). He was swinging it so hard, I could hear that kid scream in pain with every blow that he was trying to shield himself with his forearms. The huge lad was swinging and his girlfriend was screaming at this kid. Finaly I hear this huge guy shouting obsenities, with heavy Russian accent, telling the kid to go back to Africa.

When other people moved in, he wanted to take off and we said no way he is geting away with this. I stopped him and said to him. NO WAY, you have to explain to the police why you did that.

His Girlfriend says, as they were coming down the stairs, this kid pointed his cellphone from under, to take a shot of her under garments and thats why he is getting a beating. THEN he opened his mouth!!!! OMG, it was as though he just crossed into Britain from Belaruss, and on top of it telling a teen who is 3rd generation Brit, TO GO BACK TO AFRICA.

This Russian was so mad, he wanted to threaten me with his Bat, police arrived and Paramedics, booked the Russian and took the lad to the Hospital.

Black Africans are discriminated every where in the World, Canada is worst with it's silent racism and STeven HArpers government is not even trying to hide it.

3rd Canadian stranded abroad and Canada had refused them entry back, because they are blacks and Muslims. Care to explain why? Your government is turning a blind eye on it's own?

1: http://www.cbc.ca/...

2: http://www.theprovince.com/...

3: http://mostlywater.org/...

4:
http://e-caucus.ca/...

Are you still a proud Canadian!! EH? after clicking on those links..
 
  by: skcusswentrohs     09/01/2009 03:44 PM     
  H. W.  
 
I think they went there for a better and calmer life but unfortunately many of them did't know it in advance that they'll be attacked.
 
  by: vizhatlan     09/01/2009 04:18 PM     
  Baffled  
 
Can anyone here provide me with a basis of why people believe that crimes against whites are largely committed by blacks?

Oh and sidenote going to skcusswentrohs all blacks are NOT Africans.
 
  by: Truhawg   09/01/2009 06:13 PM     
  @skcusswentrohs  
 
Yes I am very proud to be Canadian.

Canada is a peace-loving country
We don't start wars
We have freedom of speech
Hockey (Canada has the produced more NHLer's than any other country)
Free health care
We're not gun-happy
We support gay marriage
BC salmon
Atlantic lobster

and for many more reasons to numerous to name... this is a beautiful country!!

There are always a few rotten "eggs"... don't be such a pessimist.
 
  by: 10-4 RubberDuck   09/01/2009 06:30 PM     
  @Rubber  
 
Ooops sorry, I think I struck a nerve there EH!

Be proud to be who you are, just tell that other lumpen not to be a batant racist, EH!

@Truhawk:
Care to explain. "Oh and sidenote going to skcusswentrohs all blacks are NOT Africans."

I say all blacks originate from African Continent. Just the way Europeans originate from Europe, Asians from Asia, etc etc.

Unless if you meant to say 'not ALL AFRICANS ARE BLACK' in complexion.

In knew that.. LOL
 
  by: skcusswentrohs     09/01/2009 11:19 PM     
  @ skcusswentrohs  
 
Allow me to clarify. My remark was not to point to the darkness of the skin but to actually differentiate between an African and a Black person. For example. A black person in Jamaica is not an African they are a Jamaican. The same goes with Dominicans, Puerto Ricans, Haitians, Panamanians, Brazillians and the Blacks in the USA. Although we all share a common ancestry there are very big differences between the racial makeup and cultures of these individual Black peoples. You wouldnt call a Filipino person a Korean. They do share some things physically in common but they are unique people.

"I say all blacks originate from African Continent. Just the way Europeans originate from Europe, Asians from Asia, etc etc."

All people originated from Africa.
 
  by: Truhawg   09/02/2009 12:36 AM     
  ....  
 
@skcusswentrohs

I concocted those findings based on years of living in Halifax, Nova Scotia, where we have a fairly large black population. Ask anyone here (even a black!) and they'll tell you that blacks are responsible for the majority of the violent crime here, even though they might make up maybe 10% of the population. Whites here are too cowardly and hung up on being politically correct to stand up for themselves and the blacks know it. Just like the RCMP/city police aren't permitted to keep racial statistics for crime, as it's not politically correct to identify one group of people as more prone to crime than another, even if it may be the truth.

About your story...
If someone tried to snap a picture up my girlfriend's skirt, I think I'd probably lay a beating on them too, regardless of what color they are. So, the kid snapped a picture of his girlfriend's goodies and the guy in turn beat him with a bat. I have to ask, did this guy just happen to be carrying a bat at the time, or did he tell the black guy to stay put and run home and get home?

To answer your question, yes I'm quite proud to be a Canadian, but I'm not so proud of our government and our so called "leaders"



@Truhawg

http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/... and http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/... for starters...


@10-4 Rubber Ducky

"Canada is a peace-loving country"
Until you get a few beer into us haha :P

"We don't start wars"
Yes but we follow the americans along in them. If Harper had been in power in 2003 we'd be in Iraq too, unfortunately.

"We have freedom of speech"
Unless said speech isn't in line with popular opinion or offends some cry baby, then it becomes a hate crime.

"Hockey (Canada has the produced more NHLer's than any other country)"
F**k ya! :)

"Free health care"
...while the government rapes you of 1/3 of your pay cheque. ;)

"We're not gun-happy"
Although our criminals sure are. But, good law abiding citizens obey the gun laws ;).

"We support gay marriage"
You say it like it's a good thing.

"BC salmon"
Mmmmmm....

"Atlantic lobster"
Double mmmmm!
 
  by: rippler2k3   09/02/2009 01:14 AM     
  @ rippler  
 
thank you for the links very helpful..

but as the info points out... although that blacks are at the higher point of crime they are committing these crimes against other blacks not whites and that website even acknowledges that

Although slightly less true now than before, most murders are intraracial
From 1976 to 2005 --

86% of white victims were killed by whites
94% of black victims were killed by blacks

So I dont see how anyone is getting that blacks are the major cause of crime against whites
 
  by: truhawg   09/02/2009 07:01 PM     
  @Truehawk  
 
"All people originated from Africa." Yup you got me there, so are the Jamaicans from Africa or not? Please include, the Haitians and Dominicans while at it.

Europeans are the only ones who, know their Geographical location, as in. American Italians, Swedish American, British Americans, Polish Americans, etc etc. AND African Americans. See the difference? Where do you link Jamicans ancestry from? Please dont tell me Jamaica!

@Rippler:

She said he did that. NOT Proven EH! Yes he had a baseball Bat, which is also what raises the eye brow! As of you'd do the same if someone takes pics of your GF!?? Yea try that on me and then I will snap a picture of you and your GF begging for mercy. Point is, violence only beggets violence and oneday you will meet your match.

Now link the Nova Scotian blacks to Canaduh. Many of them are also mixed with Amerindians, but then colour of their skin, deems them Blacks and thats it.
"To answer your question, yes I'm quite proud to be a Canadian, but I'm not so proud of our government and our so called "leaders""

Well, join the club buddy. It is your leaders that have the biggest Bullhorn. To an extent last night M. Ignatief, touted his reason for elections coming fall. One of them was the exact sentiment. He said " And we will provide full support for our citizens when abroad" It's time you change that douchebag called Steven Harper who happens to be Bushes cousin.

Truehawk is right about ""We don't start wars"
Yes but we follow the americans along in them. If Harper had been in power in 2003 we'd be in Iraq too, unfortunately" If Harper prevails in the coming elections, You guys will have to line up a lot on the highway of Heros, used to be Highway 20, welcoming Bodybags for their final rest from Afghanistan. Thank you Harper. In a nut. Be proud to be Canadian, you also had Pamela Anderson and the BUTT guy (Corner Gas) HAHAHAHa.
 
  by: skcusswentrohs     09/02/2009 07:27 PM     
  @ripplemoron  
 
"We support gay marriage"
You say it like it's a good thing.



How could it possibly be a bad thing? What statistical proof do you have that shows me why gay marriage is bad and it shouldn't be legalized anywhere?

Or are you just a closet homo like a lot of the GOP trying to find some support from the rednecked, biblethumping, sisterf***ing right? =)


@OP- sweet jesus this is horrible. So much strife through out the world, both through inner-turmoil and enormous foreign conflict, and people still have the nerve to tell me that I'm going to hell because I don't believe in an "all-loving, all-knowing, perfect" god.

That's perfection alright.
 
  by: Dekar   09/02/2009 08:08 PM     
  @skcusswentrohs  
 
Are Jamaicans considered to be Africans? Even in Jamaica by other Jamaicans? Just curious, since I really hate blanket statement about race.
 
  by: TheIdiotUpstairs   09/02/2009 08:51 PM     
  ...  
 
@truhawg

I meant to also post this link, but it didn't post right...
http://www.racismeantiblanc.bizland.com/...

Also, about the first website, the graphs towards the bottom still show that black-on-white crime is higher than white-on-black. Aside from this, the statistics are based on the raw number of crimes. If one looks at this on a per capita basis and the fact that there are probably 10 times as many whites as blacks in America, it comes to light that blacks commit violent crime at a rate that's extremely disproportionate to their population.


@skcusswentrohs

Sorry, but your story is flawed and I believe you were just trying to sensationalize. I find it rather hard to believe this Russian fellow just happened to be carrying around an aluminum bat, in case some black guy tried to snap a picture up his girlfriend's skirt.

As for the blacks being mixed with Amerindians, that's not true on account of there really aren't very many aboriginals in Halifax or the surrounding areas. Most of the aboriginals in Nova Scotia are in the Cape Breton area. Most of the blacks that came to Canada in the old days settled around bedford basin as squatters in a shanty town that was named "Africville" (no joke, http://en.wikipedia.org/... The government eventually evicted them on the grounds that the "town" had illegally spread far beyond the land for which it originally had deeds. That and it was a disgusting shanty town and an eye sore. Most of them went to North Preston, with a large population also settling in what today is known as Uniac Square, one of the worst neighborhoods in the city, known specifically for it's gangs, prostitution, and crack cocaine.

Agreed on most points about Harper....he's a douche.

By the way, lose the "EH!" bit, it's annoying ;).


@Dekar

LoL, I knew someone would be all over the anti gay marriage comment. I don't need to provide you with "statistical proof" that gay marriage is wrong, but I believe it is. And guess what? Mother nature agrees with me ;).

No, I'm not a closet homo. I assure you my ass has "exit only" written all over it.

Also, I find it sad that you had to result to petty name calling. i.e. ripplemoron, closet homo, and (lmao) "rednecked, bible thumping, sister f**ker". Seriously, wtf!? Try using your big boy words ;). For the record, I'm not a redneck, I'm not a christian, and I don't fark my sister.
 
  by: rippler2k3   09/02/2009 09:33 PM     
  @rippler  
 
"Mother nature agrees with me ;)."

No, she doesn't. Homosexuality is well documented throughout the animal kingdom, and gay people have been around across our history and planet. If Mother Nature agreed with you, that wouldn't be the case - it's really as simple as that.
 
  by: MomentOfClarity     09/02/2009 10:05 PM     
  @Rippler  
 
On the basis of sensationalisation. Is it because you dont think if a acist would actually roam around with one or simply to make a counter point?

Please be proud EH. If this is annoying, than Canadians are annoying when they open their mouths to speak.

"As for the blacks being mixed with Amerindians, that's not true on account of there really aren't very many aboriginals in Halifax or the surrounding areas."

OK. Now go back in your history and you will understand that these Black Folks in question, are not the economical immigrants. There were black folks, even before the underground railroad...

@MOC.

I agree with Rippler, that mother nature agrees with him.

Dont get me wrong. But is there a purpose to being gay besides the pleasure? Just like the S&M and other sexualpleasures, is there a purpose to homosexuality?? As it being documented throughout time, it only means it has been there, just the way sky is above.

NOT saying it is wrong if you choose to be a Homosexual, currently.

@Dekar:

What if your sister asks you to F@#k her ass. Just for pleasure, would you? The only thing that is preventing you from doing that is the BIBLE, otherwise, you an adult, she an adult, took the possibilities of pregnancy seriously an in breeding blah blah balh and decided hey, if she bends over and you drive, all you are going to get out of it, is pleasure. Would you?
 
  by: skcusswentrohs     09/03/2009 12:37 AM     
  @ skcusswentrohs  
 
its truhawg... not truhawk... ok that aside.... Ancestory is not the same as culture.

"Europeans are the only ones who, know their Geographical location, as in. American Italians, Swedish American, British Americans, Polish Americans, etc etc"

So then the true hyphenated version would be African-Polish-American (ancestory-culture-residence)
As it would be if you were a Haitian-American, Jamaican-American, African-American and yes even a Black-American.
And there is a distinct difference between an African-American (meaning someone who was born and/or raised in Africa and then emigrated to America)and a Black-American who is a decendant of the slaves brought to America and cut off from their native language and culture, interbred not only with other slaves but Native Americans and Europeans.

And my original point is not all Africans are black nor are all Blacks Africans. How can you say that someone from Egypt looks like someone from South Africa. The Ivory Coast is not the same as Angola, Niger, Ethiopia or any other country located on the continent. Might I add there are a whole slew of people who are of European and Indian descent who call themselves Africans proudly and nothing else.

@ Rippler

Thanks for the new link will have really go over it later.

 
  by: truhawg   09/03/2009 12:38 AM     
  @skcusswentrohs  
 
"Is there a purpose?" Well, I've never gazed at a woman for her fertility, and I don't know too many heterosesxuals who have (well, maybe there's a quiverfull). Most people have a bit more to their relationships, and it's the damndest thing that even the infertile ones mate and marry anyway. Is the mating only for the pleasure? Do they, and presumably gays, marry because they found someone just so great in the sack that they want to snare them forever, just for pleasure? No, the purpose is the same as for any other: find a mate and form a family unit.

Animals (including people) bond gay, straight, and otherwise for more than just procreation and that's how nature made it. Homosexuality isn't just some abberation that emerged in the last century which evolution just hasn't gotten around to handling. People do it, animals do it, and they always have. I don't know where people get off thinking there's a single purpose and they've figured it out.
 
  by: MomentOfClarity     09/03/2009 01:35 AM     
  In addition  
 
"The BIBLE" is the sole reason there isn't incest? That's taboo in plenty of non-Christian cultures, so I don't see how you can support that conclusion.
 
  by: MomentOfClarity     09/03/2009 01:41 AM     
  Twist  
 
and turn and yet "find a mate and form a family unit." What family? Of one?

Two gays can not continue the multiplication of family.

A bond between a child and parent can only be formed by opposite sex, everything else is simply pleasure and coitus, an for the later, the result is continuation of humanity.

That said,I reiterate again. Currently homosexuality is a choice an it should not be dependent on acceptance or, not. When two people of the same choice make a decision, it should be respected and thats it. But there is no purpose other than pleasure.
 
  by: skcusswentrohs     09/03/2009 04:03 AM     
  @skcusswentrohs  
 
"Two gays can not continue the multiplication of family."
Stop pretending that that has ever been the sole purpose of pair-bonding.
 
  by: Ec5618   09/03/2009 04:24 AM     
  @EC  
 
Oh now you! What is the other purpose of pair bonding? Care to explain? Because it has already been mentioned, but perhaps you have another reason for pair bonding, besides boinking.
 
  by: skcusswentrohs     09/03/2009 03:19 PM     
  @Skcuss  
 
Let me explain it again. Do YOU get into relationships just for sex? Do they only become long-term relationships after screening your partner for fertility? Unless you have an incredibly shallow life, I expect not. I expect you, like most people, get into relationships not only for sex, but also for companionship, stability, and yes, family. Why you think a gay family would be any different is beyond me. They form steady, committed, monogamous relashionships, which is beneficial to the health and stability of society. They adopt or raise kids from previous marriages, which contributes to its future. If you think there's no purpose, you must not be thinking.
 
  by: MomentOfClarity     09/03/2009 08:23 PM     
  @MOC  
 
I dont know what is it that I have immersed myself into, but.

"Do YOU get into relationships just for sex?" YES. It is with a person that I like, who is going to make me happy when we are having sex and thinking of extending our genes for next generation. It is that sex that makes me like my partner, feel the bond when I connect with them, it is this drive that make me complete. I also call it love. With this person, I dont have to adopt from other couples whom make a choice of giving up their child, who will also happen to be man and a woman and not wo/manO a wo/manO.


"Do they only become long-term relationships after screening your partner for fertility?"
NO. It only depends on the way how I feel about this person, it may end up the sooner it starts, right after the 1st Sexual encounter and thats it.

"Unless you have an incredibly shallow life, I expect not." Screening my partner for fertility or diseases is not shallow, especially when I want to have children or, my partner wants to make sure that we are fertile and free from diseases. What if this future allows me to have children without any of mine, or, my partners bad genes!? Do you think thats shallow? I hope you dont. I also hope wherever you dip your stick, you have it checked. Especially if it is a long time relationship. Otherwise with you are simply not only sallow, but stupid as well (No pun intended)

"I expect you, like most people, get into relationships not only for sex," YES I DO. if it is good I stick around for a long haul and 4 kids later it is still awesome and I like it. I dont have to pay prostitutes, or think about condoms etc. Because of this bonding, which looms from my loins, i make sure my partner is happy so that my partner can make me happy in return. As I mentioned above. I call it LOVE. Furnace is between my legs.

"but also for companionship, stability, and yes, family. Why you think a gay family would be any different is beyond me."

Because their primary purpose is SEX, they will be doing the boinking part only, which we go back to there is nothing wrong with, which I mentioned above several times, but I guess you only want to read and answer to what you want. said there is nothing wrong and especially currently, which I have not explained, nor anyone gives a rats ass to know what s this current biz wax about.

"They form steady, committed, monogamous relationships, which is beneficial to the health and stability of society."
NO THEY DONT. They are not immune to breaking hearts and it is not that they dont break each others hearts, which is normal in any relationship. To paint a rosy picture of gays being monogamous, as though they have found solutions to relationship is loads of BULLSCRAP. If they are normal as you stipulate, they also have the normal problems of any relationship.

"They adopt or raise kids from previous marriages,"

Now this is where you start putting you foot into your mouth. Are these folks GAY or, not? Why d you think there is a need to Adopt? What if we are all gays, who is going to give up for adoption! This the part that I agreed with Rippler ""Mother nature agrees with me ;)."" Your nature will not continue, unless you still seek help from opposite sex in order to adopt and raise children.

"If you think there's no purpose, you must not be thinking." I am thinking and have explained, or, so me think. WHAT YOUR PURPOSE OF BEING GAY?

Psst: There is nothing wrong being gay currently. ONLY NATURE DOES NOT AGREE.
 
  by: skcusswentrohs     09/06/2009 05:23 PM     
  @skcuss  
 
So you disjointedly admit you mate for happiness, love, and family. So, if one of you were sterile, the relationship would hopefully be about more than "just sex." So, your relationship is a prime example that relationships in general are about more than sex. You've yet to evidence why gays would be any different in their relationships, so why don't you get to that?

It's not hard to figure out how a gay couple can raise kids. Sometimes people marry straight, manage to have kids through perseverence or bisexuality, and later divorce only to enter a homosexual relationship. Thus, the new gay couple raises kids. They can also adopt. Funny enough, animals in nature do this, too. Even funnier are these ideas:

"What if we are all gays, who is going to give up for adoption!"

Are we all gay? No, we're not, so that's a rather pointless thing to ponder, especially when you continue that...

"Your nature will not continue, unless you still seek help from opposite sex in order to adopt and raise children."

My "nature?" And just what is that? I can only assume you mean gay, but since gay people come from straight parents, I don't see what sense that makes, either. That's why there have always been and always will be homosexual creatures on this planet, the way nature intended.
 
  by: MomentOfClarity     09/11/2009 01:36 AM     
  Don't know if it relates to anything here  
 
I remember reading a long time ago (maybe as much as 15 years ago) about a study done by some zoologist on prairie dogs. He had a few acres of land, fenced it off, and placed a few prairie dogs in it. Then he added more and more prairie dogs just to see what would happen. From what I can remember, and it really has been a long time, the prairie dogs were of mixed sexes, about half and half. An odd thing that he found was that the more dense the population got, the greater the instance was of homosexual behavior, per capita. Then, when he started removing prairie dogs from the area, the instances, per capita, of homosexual acts went back down.

I don't know if this has any bearing on this particular topic, and I don't know if it really means anything, but just thought I would throw this in. I wonder if the chances of being homosexual, per capita, in urban areas is higher than rural areas, amongst humans.

Don't ask me for a link to this because I did just about every kind of search that I could think of, and couldn't find it.
 
  by: TheIdiotUpstairs   09/11/2009 02:18 AM     
  @IUS  
 
There is another farm that creates same scenerios like this farm. It is called prison.

@MOC:
"My "nature?" And just what is that? I can only assume you mean gay, but since gay people come from straight parents, I don't see what sense that makes, either. That's why there have always been and always will be homosexual creatures on this planet, the way nature intended."

I think you are circumventing the point. Natural has a purpose to it, as in hetero sexual couple wear condome as means of protection from pregnancy and diseases. These purposes are two different reasons, which I am trying to bring it home.

Gays use condomes for diseases protection only, that should tell you somethig, but then!!

Homosexuality has been around from the begining of time, and it also exists in animal world, including adoption amongst animals, heck, animals have adopted humans as well http://www.shortnews.com/...

Humans have also adopted animals for reason none other than pleasure http://www.shortnews.com/... If you want to play word games, I am not here to simply wrangle you on semantics, nor to condemn homosexuality, not at all.

Heck sometimes for release, I spank the monkey too and the purpose is P-L-E-A-S-U-R-E. Has nothing to do with the capacity of loving, adopting and the rest of blah³..
 
  by: skcusswentrohs     09/12/2009 04:13 PM     
  @skcuss  
 
That made absolutely no sense, and I think I know why - you don't have any idea what you mean when you say "Nature does not agree with homosexuality." You, like the rest of us, have no idea what nature intends, so you just try to make sense of it in terms of your own ideas, which do not hold up to scrutiny. You state gays mate only for pleasure, but contradict yourself in conceeding that they mate for every other reason heterosexuals do (then try to dismiss this as irrelevant). You state they cannot form families yet that's obviously wrong because gay people and animals cohabitate AND adopt, forming a family unit. Finally, you conceed that there have always been gays, and while you harp on the fact that they can't breed as being proof nature does not "agree" with them, that fact that they keep being born in spite of not being able to reproduce their own kind almost sounds like nature helping them out, not disagreeing. In conclusion, it doesn't sound like you have any idea what nature "agrees" with, and maybe you should consider what such a statement is even supposed to mean before you go endorsing it.
 
  by: MomentOfClarity     09/14/2009 07:44 PM     
  Regarding Blacks-1  
 
I am of Asian origin and have some general comments about blacks. These are general comments and so are not meant for any particular individual who belongs to the black race.
I have been living amongst Asians(of various differing physical traits, cultures and religions)and only recently have encounters with Africans with a steady influx of African students into my country. I have to say that my encounters with them have been generally negative.
There is some basis for the prejudice that some whites(and even some asians)have against blacks(in general) based on my experience.
1. Blacks in my country and neighbourhood are often disrespectful of the peace and quiet of other residents. Partying till the wee mornings, involvement in drugs, scams etc. We have to tolerate their ways but they don't want to conform to our ways when they are not in their own country!
2. Many gang-rapes of asian women by bands of black guys have occurred and blacks have a disproportionately higher tendency to do so(in my country) compared to asian men or white guys. Their targets are the usual FAIR-SKINNED girls(I believe it is a black guy's fetish to 'lay' with a fair-skinned girl-preferably a white girl). In my apartment, an African guy molested a girl of Chinese descent and was deported back to Africa. We are generally fearful to be in the same lift with a black guy and it is not without basis!
3. Generally, Africans have not succeeded intellectually, culturally, economically and scientifically compared to other racial groups. Of course, some black individuals are brilliant intellectually but I am talking in general. There is no doubt that the scientific and technological developments of the 19th till 21st Century were mostly pioneered by whites. Look at sub-saharan Africa, its primitivity, corruption, lack of progress, a history devoid of technically and intellectually 'high' civilizations(unlike Middle East, Eastern Asia, South America and Europe) some sort of 'confirmed' why other races tend not to look in favour of blacks migrating to our countries. We FEAR them, actually. And that fear, in my opinion, is NOT unreasonable. The fear that we will be overwhelmed by them and lose our identities which brings me to point number 4:-
4. Black man propogates with an Asian girl will produce phenotypically(physical appearance) black offsprings. And vice versa is also true(and it will be no surprise that an Asian man dating with a black girl is very rare indeed). With so much influx of Africans and our (politically-correct) media promoting inter-racial marriages and relationships, will my country become another African nation when we all lose our identities as Asian peoples?
5. Sorry to say this but shallow though this may sound, generally speaking, aesthetically the fair-skinned peoples are considered beautiful. Whether you go to India right to China, to Europe and yes even to Africa - it is true. Africans may deny this but they wanting to be 'accepted' and 'equal' to whites or the pride of having a white girlfriend proves otherwise. So much of skin-whitening products consumed by ladies of various nationalities prove my point. Even religious books and myths and fairy tales of old(not the current Disney rendition or 'new tales' which are politically-correct) equate fair and bright with good and holy; darkness and blackness with fear, evil and the unkown. Although to blanket this to an individual of African descent is unfair but hey...that's reality! Reality IS UNFAIR. There are the smart and the stupid, the beautiful and the ugly, the rich and the poor etc. I don't want my progeny to be 'not beautiful' in my eyes.
5. The media is lop-sided in potraying 'white racism' in a negative light without castigating black racism! So many American shows depict the 'wickedness of white racists' but are OK with racist(anti-white) statements of blacks. This is pure PC. Racists are evident in all ethnic groups - not just whites. Many will brand me a racist after reading this comment but I don't care - at least I am saying the truth about what I think. People become so-called 'racist' because of many reasons - some out of (not totally unreasonable) fear - eg in some whites vs Africans or Muslims; others out of envy - eg Palestinians vs Jews, blacks vs whites, Muslims vs the West. Pick your choice! Generally speaking, of course.
These are just some of the points that I wish to put forth after living in an apartment with increasing numbers of African tenants.
Biologically speaking, the 'prejudice' and 'racism' so castigated by media is there so that:-
1. We keep our identities as distinct nationalities/ethnic groups.
2. It saves us , in some way, from becoming a victim of a crime/crime statistics.
I don't mean to say that prejudice is 'right' but we all see things through our differing cultures/ethnic groups.

 
  by: asian7   09/24/2009 08:48 AM     
  Regarding Blacks - 2  
 
On a more positive note(mixed with some negativity), the following are what I think (generally) regarding blacks:-
1. They have the 'rhythm' and musically the rhythmic aspect of their psyche is put to the fore in rap, hip-hop etc. Nevertheless, being more (western) classically inclined, I'd prefer jazz than hip-hop and rap which I feel, although are complex rhythmically, are aesthetically of 'lower' value due to the void of harmonic , melodic and 'contrapuntal' beauty. Blacks should channel their artistic flair for rhythm into a higher culture and not 'relook' into the dark past of sub-saharan African tribalism and darkness. The kind of music we like, we produce and we hear, in my opinion, reflects the attainment of our civilization. Western civilization, in my opinion, is on the way down.
2.That they are physically 'superior' to Asians(except maybe the Northeast Asians) and whites are quite apparent - so many of them are 6-footers. Too bad, their physique are quite often 'utilized' negatively - eg like in crime, rapes etc. In sports, we see blacks excel in sprints, atheletics which demonstrate their physical prowess - no Asian or White can beat them. We see them less in sports that require cunning, strategy and elegance - such as badminton. There, generally Asians and Whites reign.
So many have claimed race is a social construct and has little biological relevance. Knowing the fact that the HLA of different ethnic groups differ and have a MEDICAL bearing disproves these PC claims. We ARE different. How do we learn and accept that we are different? Not the PC way for sure....!
An advice for Africans living in non-African countries:-
1. Mend your ways! Instead of complaining and whining that everyone non-African looks down on you folks(which are generally TRUE!), study hard and stop partying, selling fake watches, making a lot of noise, and checking on the local non-African girls and wanting to be 'accepted' as a boyfriend and hoping that her parents will accept you and then cry foul at her society for being 'racists'! Study hard, develop your minds aesthetically and intellectually and then...
2. Go back to your country in Africa to develop yopur country. If your country is poor, filled with violence and AIDS, devoid of any civilizational value....WHO will even start accepting you? Don't linger around in Europe and Asia creating problems and wanting to be 'accepted'. No, you are African - we are Asians(in my country), or Russians, Germans etc. A Russian is a white(caucasian) HISTORICALLY and ETHNO-CULTURALLY - so let them be that way. Why must the world and media subtly coerce all of us to amalgamate into one mass of people devoid of ethnic and cultural roots with OUR OWN PHYSICAL APPEARANCES which are different? Even Africans come out with their blogs of "African in a such-and such a country" - you yourselves know that you are different from those in that non-African country, why can't you accept that we want to remain DIFFERENT from you? Learn from those who are technically and intellectually and culturally better than you. Swallow your pride and maybe that will improve African nations and PERCEPTION of non-Africans regarding Africans?
The PC way is a pernicious way because the truth is not told regarding what people actually feel inside. And no development can occur if people are fed with those same nice-sounding lies. All the beat to everyone!

 
  by: asian7   09/24/2009 09:17 AM     
  Regarding Blacks - 2  
 
On a more positive note(mixed with some negativity), the following are what I think (generally) regarding blacks:-
1. They have the 'rhythm' and musically the rhythmic aspect of their psyche is put to the fore in rap, hip-hop etc. Nevertheless, being more (western) classically inclined, I'd prefer jazz than hip-hop and rap which I feel, although are complex rhythmically, are aesthetically of 'lower' value due to the void of harmonic , melodic and 'contrapuntal' beauty. Blacks should channel their artistic flair for rhythm into a higher culture and not 'relook' into the dark past of sub-saharan African tribalism and darkness. The kind of music we like, we produce and we hear, in my opinion, reflects the attainment of our civilization. Western civilization, in my opinion, is on the way down.
2.That they are physically 'superior' to Asians(except maybe the Northeast Asians) and whites are quite apparent - so many of them are 6-footers. Too bad, their physique are quite often 'utilized' negatively - eg like in crime, rapes etc. In sports, we see blacks excel in sprints, atheletics which demonstrate their physical prowess - no Asian or White can beat them. We see them less in sports that require cunning, strategy and elegance - such as badminton. There, generally Asians and Whites reign.
So many have claimed race is a social construct and has little biological relevance. Knowing the fact that the HLA of different ethnic groups differ and have a MEDICAL bearing disproves these PC claims. We ARE different. How do we learn and accept that we are different? Not the PC way for sure....!
An advice for Africans living in non-African countries:-
1. Mend your ways! Instead of complaining and whining that everyone non-African looks down on you folks(which are generally TRUE!), study hard and stop partying, selling fake watches, making a lot of noise, and checking on the local non-African girls and wanting to be 'accepted' as a boyfriend and hoping that her parents will accept you and then cry foul at her society for being 'racists'! Study hard, develop your minds aesthetically and intellectually and then...
2. Go back to your country in Africa to develop yopur country. If your country is poor, filled with violence and AIDS, devoid of any civilizational value....WHO will even start accepting you? Don't linger around in Europe and Asia creating problems and wanting to be 'accepted'. No, you are African - we are Asians(in my country), or Russians, Germans etc. A Russian is a white(caucasian) HISTORICALLY and ETHNO-CULTURALLY - so let them be that way. Why must the world and media subtly coerce all of us to amalgamate into one mass of people devoid of ethnic and cultural roots with OUR OWN PHYSICAL APPEARANCES which are different? Even Africans come out with their blogs of "African in a such-and such a country" - you yourselves know that you are different from those in that non-African country, why can't you accept that we want to remain DIFFERENT from you? Learn from those who are technically and intellectually and culturally better than you. Swallow your pride and maybe that will improve African nations and PERCEPTION of non-Africans regarding Africans?
The PC way is a pernicious way because the truth is not told regarding what people actually feel inside. And no development can occur if people are fed with those same nice-sounding lies. All the best to everyone!

 
  by: asian7   09/24/2009 09:17 AM     
  Regarding 'regarding blacks -1 and -2'  
 
In Regarding Blacks -1, it appears that I have forgotten how to count! "The media is lop-sided...etc.." is point # 6. And in Regarding Blacks-2, I meant to end it with "All the best to everyone!". Sorry - I am a 'perfectionist'. There are just too many grammatical and spelling errors in my comments to edit though. Cheers!
 
  by: asian7   09/24/2009 10:01 AM     
 
 
Copyright ©2018 ShortNews GmbH & Co. KG, Contact: info@shortnews.com