Evidence of Direct Link Between Taliban and 9/11 Hijackers Found?

bin Laden was a "guest" of the Taliban in Afghanistan before 9/11. Hence President Bush´s demand to "surrender bin Laden or surrender power."

and yet they still can´t actually tie the so-called 9/11 mastermind, bin laden to 9/11... and yet to this day still most people accept it as absolute truth.

i´m still waiting for them to actually tie foreign hijackers to 9/11 that AREN"T affialliated with US government agencies/military...its been reported and repeated over and over adnasseum, never proven, yet nearly absolutely accepted by the majority of people.

at this rate we´ll never no for sure what actually happened 8 years ago... how sad it is that history can be re-written litterally before our eyes, and we (for the most part) just accept it as absolute truth.

to know our history is nothing but a bunch of lies.

History will be just like a fantasy fairytale. It makes me wonder about about all the other history now.

"bin Laden was a "guest" of the Taliban in Afghanistan before 9/11. Hence President Bush´s demand to "surrender bin Laden or surrender power.""

Didn´t the taliban ask for evidence before saying that they would voluntarily hand over Osama? None was ever produced as far as I can recall.

All the money funneled into Pakistan, I´m sure they can come up with all kinds of ´evidence´

...,and I´m not implying anything, I´m just surprised and curious. What I wonder is why does no one mention or seem to care about Osama bin laden anymore? I mean, he was THE mastermind, yet it´s like he´s on the back burner, or off the stove completely! I just wonder where all the passion to get the perp is, and more to the point, where the perp is, lol.

I was taught in history class that history is written only by the point of view of a view chosen people. Like the saying goes there are 2 sides to every story. It´s a little harder to do in todays world with TV and such but it is still done

...is written by the victors.

is the same argument used by the Holocaust deniers. They point out that no one has ever shown PROOF that there were holes in the ceilings of the concentration camp showers (supposedly, these holes were used to drop in the cyanide capsules that ´gassed´ the jews).

This is true. There is no evidence aside from the testimony of survivors, as the Nazi´s ordered the roofs demolished (thus destroying any evidence that could be used against them in court.)

The Twin Towers are gone as well, along with the ´hard´ evidence.

...people or their ideas with hitler or nazi germany in some fashion, no matter how irrelevant, is a common theme used in attempts to discredit someones ideas or stifle uncomfortable questions.

actually i´m pretty sure he was saying that the same thing the nazi´s did; destroy the evidence of their crimes, is the same thing that happened when 9/11 occured, all physical evidence (aside from a few peices of debris one of which was sent to steven jones for analysis by a rescue worker, in which he indentifified thermate, after he went public he got sacked from his teaching profession) was prompty removed and destroyed (recycled).

i don´t think he was actually using hitler or nazi germany to try discredit 9/11 evidence/theory.

nor was i, when i and several others brought up the comparison years ago between the patriot act and the enabling act... or for that matter 9/11 (or 7/7 in the case of the UK) and the reichstag fire.

like it or not some references to hitler and nazi germany from time to time are justified and even seemingly accurate... though i´m sure they´re uncomfortable for those people living in countries or having leadership holding to the same modus operandi; socially and militarily.

My reference to the holocaust was made to point out that sometimes the evidence needed to prove or disprove an issue is lost. In those cases we have to build a case based upon TONS of circumstantial evidence.