ShortNews
+ + + 3 BRANDNEW NewsTickers for your Website! + + + easy configurable in less than 1 Minute + + + GET'EM NOW! + + +

   Home | Join | Submit News | MyShortNews | HighScores | FAQ'S | Forums 0 Users Online   
   
                 01/18/2018 12:37 PM  
  ShortNews Search
search all Channels
RSS feeds
  ShortNews User Poll
Are you excited about the holiday season?
  Latest Events
  1.952 Visits   3 Assessments  Show users who Rated this:
Quality: Good
Back to Overview  
01/31/2010 07:23 PM ID: 82698 Permalink   

Clinton Talks Tough to China

 

Hillary Rodham Clinton is pressuring China to obey America and impose the sanction against Iran, or face repercussion and alienation from the US.
Speaking in Paris, she said China has to stop supplying Iran any technology to its nuclear sector.

This may provoke Israel to strike Iran, as it would regard it as an "existential threat." Clinton believes China is doing that because they are a major recipient of Iranian oil, the source of energy needed by the ever-growing Chinese economy.

In an effort to further its sanctions, America is in the works to blacklist financial institutions of all nations from helping Iran´s nuclear program. These standoffs have been triggered by the recent issues over Internet freedom, as Google was hacked into.

 
  Source: www.nytimes.com  
    WebReporter: skcusswentrohs  Show Calling Card      
  Recommendation:  
ASSESS this news: BLOCK this news. Reason:
   
  19 Comments
  
  I am not into bondage or anything...  
 
but can´t Obama gag and chain this woman.

Any leaders would be worried when threats like possible would have to face both an "economic insecurity and diplomatic isolation". So basically excluded with no deals and big problems, should they not comply. If China goes ahead, because of what they most probably feel they are being very much being forced into this will be YET another problem we can add to the resources of our militaries because China will not forget this threat!
 
  by: captainJane     01/31/2010 07:52 PM     
  @CaptainJ  
 
When you look at these both arguments, it is like children fighting inside a sandbox. One says, dont talk to them and the other is pointing at the other friend of a friend.

I dont know, how Americans justify these sanctions, when there is not a single peep, over Israels nuclear arsenal and the rest of the World has to shut up!
 
  by: skcusswentrohs     01/31/2010 08:12 PM     
  ha!  
 
bill made china a favorate trade nation after years of no trade. they have been gaining billions each year and because of him has become an oil glutton nation. now hillary believes she is queen and acts like she is in charge of the u.s. policies with china.
 
  by: shannon853   02/01/2010 03:02 AM     
  ball and gag  
 
and a whole lot more this lady is a bucket of turd she has no business in politics what so ever
 
  by: Devil Duck     02/01/2010 04:27 AM     
  @DD  
 
Imagine if she had been the president?

@Shanon.
Huh!?
 
  by: skcusswentrohs     02/01/2010 04:44 AM     
  China laughs at this  
 
The US can do nothing, this is just hollow talk to look tough and the Chinese know it!
 
  by: evilrat   02/01/2010 09:42 AM     
  People think there are empty threats  
 
But if the US says OK here are such and such amount of fines, we will effectively nullify any dept we have with them in the world court. We wont nuke The middle east, but China, HMMN, maybe they need a reduction in population, and chances are, we´d be in cahoots with their own government, they care about MONEY not their own people, don´t ever forget that...
 
  by: OrIgInAl_ThOuGhT   02/01/2010 07:25 PM     
  The world is going no where...  
 
and what can you expect with the bunch of retards running all the countries concerned. Obama has been making the right moves so far but what is his view on this one?
 
  by: captainJane     02/01/2010 07:41 PM     
  nothing new  
 
China has been doing business with USA´s "enemies" for a long time now. Why start to threaten them now?
 
  by: shaohu     02/02/2010 09:02 AM     
  this has been going on before  
 
google was hacked, it all started a little over a year ago, it is just only escalating because iran is really close to nukes, when they get ´em you´ll see what happens .. anyhow, the chinese have always be superstitious when it comes to women, and they view women as second class citizens and servants, they really don´t listen to women involved in what they consider men´s business, our politicians and government knows this. When the men start talking to the chinese like this, then you should worry :-)

chinese superstitious, when a woman is on her monthly cycle it is bad luck for her to handle money and to be in an establishment of business of a relative .. anyhow, my mother has 2 friends from red china, here in the US (a married couple) and they are very well to do, with many business establishments, the husband k.c. said when he was asked what did he do in china, he kinda looked mad and embarrassed, he said factoy manager, he said "I go to college and get many degrees and all the government would give is manager in factory" .. there in china you are given your job and other things the chinese government say that you can only have. It does not matter how smart you are or whatever .. it´s do as I say and that´s all there is.

 
  by: Key2000     02/02/2010 12:26 PM     
  @Key2  
 
Stop smoking! Whatthehellwasthat?
 
  by: skcusswentrohs     02/02/2010 02:49 PM     
  What original thought? Idiot  
 
@original thought, your words simply show that you are incredibly stupid and haven´t thought anything through.

You want to nullify $700+ billion worth in treasuries plus another $2+ trillion in FX reserves from the Chinese account book. Have you gone mad? That is effectively announcing that the US is defaulting on its own debt. Credit flow gets hammered and the interest rate skyrockets to 50%+. No foreign country or company would dare to do business with the US after that.

In another fit of sheer stupidity you are recommending the use of nuclear weapons on China because they "need a reduction in population". Perhaps the term "mutually assured destruction" doesn´t mean a thing to you. Other than that, do you really think all the other countries in the world are going to sit back and watch you nuke China because you think they have too many people?

It really is ironic that for your name, its more that likely that you have never had an original thought in your life and if you continue with these bland generalisations then you never will.
 
  by: yreulogy   02/02/2010 04:04 PM     
  @skcus  
 
it´s god damn straight facts :-)
 
  by: Key2000     02/03/2010 05:28 AM     
  @Key2  
 
You lad very funny. You stop puff, puff.
 
  by: skcusswentrohs     02/03/2010 06:01 AM     
  ha  
 
i´m 45 yrs old thanks lassie :-)
 
  by: Key2000     02/04/2010 12:02 AM     
  @Key2  
 
Really! 45? Wow, And I thought my children were childish.
 
  by: skcusswentrohs     02/04/2010 12:21 AM     
  @yreulogy  
 
you could have just as easily made your point without the insults.
 
  by: John E Angel     02/04/2010 12:23 AM     
  Skuss  
 
how old your kids? mine 23 and 22 both young adult women :-)
 
  by: Key2000     02/04/2010 12:24 AM     
  RE: John E Angel  
 
Without the insults? Perhaps, to the rest of the crowd in this thread, but the guy´s so thick headed that he would even realise if a cement truck rolled over it. Case in point, he´s simply trolled over to the "China Warns Obama Not to Meet the Dalai Lama" thread and once again recommended that China get nuked.

As I said previously, he´s a moron with an ironic name.
 
  by: yreulogy   02/08/2010 12:51 AM     
 
 
Copyright ©2018 ShortNews GmbH & Co. KG, Contact: info@shortnews.com