+ + + 3 BRANDNEW NewsTickers for your Website! + + + easy configurable in less than 1 Minute + + + GET'EM NOW! + + +

   Home | Join | Submit News | MyShortNews | HighScores | FAQ'S | Forums 0 Users Online   
                 02/23/2018 11:29 AM  
  ShortNews Search
search all Channels
RSS feeds
  ShortNews User Poll
Are you excited about the holiday season?
  Latest Events
  2.537 Visits   1 Assessments  Show users who Rated this:
Quality:Very Good
Back to Overview  
11/17/2010 09:04 AM ID: 86370 Permalink   

100s of Unborn Babies Found Dumped in Buddhist Temple


In central Bangkok, inside a Buddhist temple, plastic bags with unborn baby corpses have been found hidden by a temple staff member. It is assumed that the bags are from illegal abortion clinics and now investigations are underway.

A rescue worker with the Poh Teck Tung foundation hinted that hundreds of corpses could eventually be uncovered.

“Our figure we received a moment ago is 240, but we think that there are between 300 to 500 foetuses as we have only searched half the area", he said.

    WebReporter: alisha rose Show Calling Card      
ASSESS this news: BLOCK this news. Reason:
  Why were they dumped there?  
This is sickening!
  by: captainJane     11/17/2010 12:20 PM     
sanctuary? Or due to a belief in karma? Any answers anyone?
  by: alisha rose     11/17/2010 12:55 PM     
yeah, why would someone do this? I do not profess to be an expert on any religion, let alone buddhism, but what would the reasoning be for this act..?
  by: Allanthar     11/17/2010 02:36 PM     
  Just guessing here  
Maybe the "temple staff member" (i.e. ´acting alone´) was going to burn them.
Kind of like how Christian anti-abortion folks will go through the dumpsters at abortion clinics, retrieve the aborted fetuses, and give them a Christian burial.

Like I said, Just guessing.

  by: VermiciousG     11/17/2010 04:49 PM     
  In America  
we throw them in a blender.
  by: MannyisHere     11/18/2010 03:39 AM     
  Really. @Manny  
I thought only the British government did that.

@VG. That makes a bit sense.
  by: captainJane     11/18/2010 04:25 AM     
  Awesome New Band...  
The Unborn Baby Corpses: An experiment in Jazz/Punk fusion.
  by: opinionated   11/18/2010 06:00 AM     
Title Said ´unborn babies´. What is an unborn baby?
  by: kmazzawi     11/18/2010 02:09 PM     
un-born baby better? Does a baby have feelings etc while in the womb? Do you have any feelings towards a child still in the womb?

If you have answered no to these 2 questions you maybe unfeeling/ dead yourself.
  by: alisha rose     11/19/2010 11:29 AM     
  @alisha rose  
"Does a baby have feelings etc while in the womb?"
I don´t know, and neither do you.

"Do you have any feelings towards a child still in the womb?"
Yes, and because of that I would never do anything to my body that would hurt the baby within. Yah know, had I a womb. But I´m not these women and I would never tell someone else what to do with their own bodies.
  by: VermiciousG     11/20/2010 12:38 AM     
upon ones body by a child within could seem like a problem and I can understand that. I can also understand that to put the questions forward as I did could sound like an affront to the ´freedom of individual women´ to choose what they do with their bodies. Although that is the popular conclusion I guess. It was not was what I was saying. It is hard to advocate for or on the side of a child that is still in the womb (and obviously we cannot speak on their behalf). The flip side of that is it is not a good thing to right off the feelings of those who have lost a child before they are born either. To catagorise a child that is ´unborn´ as being inconsequential is also an affront to those who have lost a child before they are born and also an affront (potentially) to those that have jealously guarded their growing child in their womb.

It is a hard one to label, as each situation is different.

Some things we would like to easily place in a compartment.

Case by case contexts are difficult. And it is hard to make a judgement on these. However an advocate for an unborn should not be shot down, just on the basis of a womens needing a say on what happens to their bodies a person should not be shot down. But to look at them as being mutually exclusive is to be ignorant also!

[ edited by alisha rose ]
  by: alisha rose     11/20/2010 03:31 AM     
  @alisha rose  
Good point.
  by: VermiciousG     11/20/2010 08:11 AM     
Copyright ©2018 ShortNews GmbH & Co. KG, Contact: