ShortNews
+ + + 3 BRANDNEW NewsTickers for your Website! + + + easy configurable in less than 1 Minute + + + GET'EM NOW! + + +

   Home | Join | Submit News | MyShortNews | HighScores | FAQ'S | Forums 0 Users Online   
   
                 02/08/2016 07:06 AM  
  ShortNews Search
search all Channels
RSS feeds
   Top News Current Events
Squirrel Causes Power Outage in Tulsa
Pentagon Releases Hundreds of Abu Ghraib Torture Photos
Tattoo Parlors Offer Free Ink for Trump and Sanders Fans
California Man Sues McDonald´s Over Their New Mozzarella Sticks
MTV and BMX Star Dave Mirra Dead of Suspected Suicide
Plane Makes Emergency Landing After Explosion Tears Gaping Hole in Its Side
Dolphin Photobombs Maternity Picture
Florida Woman Pulls Over Police Officer, Confronts Him for Speeding
Man Facing Charges for Trying to Smuggle Birds Into U.S. By Hiding Them in His Pants
University of Florida Student Killed, Falls Six Floors
more News
out of this Channel...
  5.124 Visits   1 Assessments  Show users who Rated this:
Quality:Very Good
Back to Overview  
04/10/2012 04:53 PM ID: 91815 Permalink   

Man Installed Hidden Cameras to Record Nude, Underage Girls

 

A New Jersey man who allegedly installed hidden cameras in his home to record nude images of at least seven underage girls faces child pornography charges.

49-year-old computer programmer Ronald Oshrin of Budd Lake filmed the "pre-pubescent girls" in the bathroom and bedroom and monitored the cameras when the girls changed clothes and used the shower or toilet.

The charge of distribution of child pornography carries a maximum potential penalty of 20 years in prison.

 
  Source: www.upi.com  
    WebReporter: edie Show Calling Card      
  Recommendation:  
ASSESS this news: BLOCK this news. Reason:
   
  3 Comments
  
  The question is...  
 
What were the girls doing there in the first place and how did they get there?
 
  by: SiRpLo   04/12/2012 04:05 AM     
  ^^^  
 
They aren´t saying what connection he had to the victims. Here is more info:

http://www.nj.com/...
 
  by: Lurker     04/12/2012 04:53 AM     
  You´d assume they´d be his child´s friends  
 
Or possibly his neice/nephews.

Which would be why they´re not mentioning it, to protect them to what little degree they can.
 
  by: tantryl   04/13/2012 02:58 AM     
 
 
Copyright ©2016 ShortNews GmbH & Co. KG, Contact: info@shortnews.com